MANUFACTURING PROTOTYPE
OVERVIEW
Participants design and manufacture a prototype of a product and provide a description of how the product could be manufactured in a state-of-the-art American industry. The specific theme for the 2001 conference is a "product used in an automobile." The theme for 2002 is a "product" used in an office.
PURPOSE
The Manufacturing Prototype event provides an opportunity for TSA members to demonstrate their ability to create quality products using different materials with innovative features that have relevant application for consumers.
ELIGIBILITY
Entries are limited to two (2) individuals per chapter.
TIME LIMITS
Entries must be completed during the current school year.
PROCEDURE
A. Participants check in their entries at the time and place stated in the conference program.
B. Entries are reviewed by evaluators.
C. Ten (10) finalists are announced at the awards ceremony.
REGULATIONS
A. Each entry consists of the prototype itself and accompanying documentation.
B. Prototype
1. Only original products designed by the participant may be entered. A product made from a kit is not considered a prototype. However, standard hardware, pre-manufactured parts, and specialty items such as LED clocks, pens, bearings, gears, batteries, etc. may be purchased and used in the manufacture of the prototype.
2. A prototype is a full-size working model.
3. The products limited to 24" x 24" x 24". For example, a product with an antenna or similar parts must be contained within the stated maximum space displacement.
4. The product should display good workmanship and effective use of the selected material (craftsmanship).
5. The product should function in a manner that solves the problem identified at the beginning of the challenge (appropriate solution).
6. The product must not include combustible engines or flammable fuels.
7. The product must not require external A/C power. Batteries may be used.
Documentation
1. The documentation is contained in a portfolio (a standard 1" three-ring binder) and is computer generated on standard 8 1/2" x 11" paper (except for the working drawing).
2. The portfolio contains the following sheets or multiple page sections in the following order:
a. Cover sheet--centered on the page in conservative lines, the product name, followed by conference site, and the conference date (single page).
b. Description of product--a written description of the product, use, its need or intent, and related safety considerations (single page).
c. Design efforts--sketches, pictures, magazine clippings, and other graphic design elements that were used in the development of the final design (3 pages maximum).
d. Working drawings--an orthographic dimensioned drawing, assembly, or pictorial may be presented, with orthographic drawing(s) shown first in this section. Drawings may be on paper no larger than B size (11" x 17") and folded to fit the three-ring binder (2 pages maximum).
e. Materials list--a bill of materials including costs (also, size and market value) used to fabricate the product must be incorporated. Each item or sub-assembly should be identified as student produced standard stock item, or purchased sub-assembly (one page).
f. Tool and machine list--a list of hand, power, and stationary tools used to fabricate the product (one page).
g. Production plans--either a production outline, flow chart, or spreadsheet of the product (6 pages maximum).
EVALUATION
Entries are evaluated on the documentation provided in the portfolio and on the quality of the product.
MANUFACTURING PROTOTYPE
EVENT COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONNEL
A. Event coordinator
B. Event evaluators, three (3)
MATERIALS
A. Coordinator's box, containing:
1. Event guide lines, four (4)
2. Official rating forms
3. List of entries, with finalist report
4. List of event evaluators/assistants
5. Marking pens for evaluators, three (3)
6. Results envelope
B. Tape measure to evaluate size of prototype
C. Display tables for entries
D. Chairs for evaluators
PROCEDURE
|
MANUFACTURING PROTOTYPE
2001-2002 OFFICIAL RATING FORM Junior or HIGH SCHOOL |
|||||||||||||
|
ENTRANT'S ID #
EVALUATIVE CRITERIA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Documentation (50 pts.) Cover sheet................. ........... 2 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
Description of product ............... ......... 8 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
Design effort................... ....... 8 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
Working drawing .............. ............. 10 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
Bill of materials ................ ............ 4 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
Tool and machine list .......... ............ 3 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
Production plan ..................... ........ 15 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
Product (50 pts.) Craftsmanship .................... .. ........ 15 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
Product solution and function..... ........ 15 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
Uniqueness, originality ................. . ..... 10 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
Tolerance of examples................... . ..... 10 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
SUBTOTAL ........................... ....... 100 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
Rules violation (if any) ......... .......minus 20 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
TOTAL ................................. ..... 100 pts. |
|||||||||||||
|
Evaluator's comments/notes: |
|||||||||||||
|
I certify these results to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Evaluator's signature ___________________________ |
|||||||||||||